headerdesktop cupon09dec25

MAI SUNT 00:00:00:00

MAI SUNT

X

headermobile cupon09dec25

MAI SUNT 00:00:00:00

MAI SUNT

X

Promotii popup img

CUPON activ: LIB20COZONAC

Aplica-l in comanda »

The Sceptical Chymist: Chymico-Physical: Doubts & Paradoxes

De (autor): Robert Boyle

The Sceptical Chymist: Chymico-Physical: Doubts & Paradoxes - Robert Boyle

The Sceptical Chymist: Chymico-Physical: Doubts & Paradoxes

De (autor): Robert Boyle

The Sceptical Chymist: or Chymico-Physical Doubts & Paradoxes is the title of a book by Robert Boyle, published in London in 1661. In the form of a dialogue, the Sceptical Chymist presented Boyle's hypothesis that matter consisted of atoms and clusters of atoms in motion and that every phenomenon was the result of collisions of particles in motion. For these reasons Robert Boyle has been called the founder of modern chemistry by J. R. Partington. Boyle first argued that fire is not a universal and sufficient analyzer of dividing all bodies into their elements, contrary to Jean Beguin and Joseph Duchesne. To prove this he turned for support to Jan Baptist van Helmont whose Alkahest was reputed to be a universal analyzer.
Citește mai mult

-10%

PRP: 77.11 Lei

!

Acesta este Prețul Recomandat de Producător. Prețul de vânzare al produsului este afișat mai jos.

69.40Lei

69.40Lei

77.11 Lei

Primești 69 puncte

Important icon msg

Primești puncte de fidelitate după fiecare comandă! 100 puncte de fidelitate reprezintă 1 leu. Folosește-le la viitoarele achiziții!

Livrare in 2-4 saptamani

Descrierea produsului

The Sceptical Chymist: or Chymico-Physical Doubts & Paradoxes is the title of a book by Robert Boyle, published in London in 1661. In the form of a dialogue, the Sceptical Chymist presented Boyle's hypothesis that matter consisted of atoms and clusters of atoms in motion and that every phenomenon was the result of collisions of particles in motion. For these reasons Robert Boyle has been called the founder of modern chemistry by J. R. Partington. Boyle first argued that fire is not a universal and sufficient analyzer of dividing all bodies into their elements, contrary to Jean Beguin and Joseph Duchesne. To prove this he turned for support to Jan Baptist van Helmont whose Alkahest was reputed to be a universal analyzer.
Citește mai mult

S-ar putea să-ți placă și

De același autor

Părerea ta e inspirație pentru comunitatea Libris!

Istoricul tău de navigare

Acum se comandă

Noi suntem despre cărți, și la fel este și

Newsletter-ul nostru.

Abonează-te la veștile literare și primești un cupon de -10% pentru viitoarea ta comandă!

*Reducerea aplicată prin cupon nu se cumulează, ci se aplică reducerea cea mai mare.

Mă abonez image one
Mă abonez image one
Accessibility Logo